|
|
|
|
|
High Court: Positive Well Marketing Sdn Bhd v OKA Concrete Industries Sdn Bhd |
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property law - Patent - Infringement of patent - Section 58 of the Patent Act 1983
Intellectual property law - Patent - Infringement of patent - Grounds of defense - Locus standi to institute suit - Section 39 of the Patent Act 1983
Intellectual property law - Patent - Infringement of patent - Grounds of defense - Novelty of invention - Section 14 of the Patent Act 1983
Whether plaintiff was the lawful registered proprietor of the patent under section 39 of the Patent Act and has locus standi to institute the suit - Whether the defendant infringed the patent under section 58 of the Patent Act - Whether the patent should be invalidated on the grounds of prior art and it was not an invention
|
|
|
|
[Click here to view the full text] |
|
|
|
|
|
| Date of Judgment |
: |
Monday, 22 August 2011 |
|
|
|
|
| Original Title |
: |
Positive Well Marketing Sdn Bhd v OKA Concrete Industries Sdn Bhd |
|
|
|
|
|
Suit No |
: |
D-22IP-14-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Court |
: |
High Court of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
|
|
Quorum |
: |
Hanipah binti Farikullah, JC |
|
|
|
|
|
Cases referred |
: |
Sevcon Ltd v Lucas CAV Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 462; R v Tolson [1864] F and F 103; Re Stephens LR 9 CP 187; Rodi and Wienenberger AG v Henry Showell Ltd [1969] 12 RPC 367; Lim Choong Huat and Others v Syntlz Enterprise Sdn Bhd and Others [2010]1 CLJ 860; SKB Shutters Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v Sang Kong Shutter Industries Sdn Bhd and Another [2011] 2MLJ 781; ICI Pointer’s Application [1977] FSR 434; Synthon BV v SmithKline Beecham PLc [2005] UKHL 59; General Tire and Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co Ltd [1972] RPC 457; Flour Oxidizing Co Ltd v Carr and Co Ltd [1908] 25 RPC 428; BTH Co Ltd v Metropolitan Vickers Electrical Co Ltd [1928] 45 RPC 1; The Allmanna Svenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget v Burntisland Shipbuilding Company Ltd [1952] 69 RPC 63; Pope Appliance Corporation v Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd [1929] AC 269; C Van Der Lely N V v Bamford Ltd [1963] RPC 61; Windsurfing International Inc v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd [1985] RPC 59; Technograph Printed Circuits Ltd v Mills and Rockely (Electronics) Ltd [1972] RPC 346; Wildey and White’s Mfg Co Ltd v Freeman and Letrik Ltd [1931] 48 RPC 405; Johns- Manville case [1967] RPC 479; Unilever Plc v Gillette (UK) Ltd [1989] RPC 417
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legislation referred |
: |
Sections 14, 39 and 58 of the Patent Act 1983; Section 65(1)(c) of the Evidence Act 1950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Publishers of MLTIC acknowledge the permission granted by the relevant official/original source for the reproduction of the above/attached materials. You shall not reproduce the above/attached materials in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the Publishers and the original/official source. Neither the Publishers nor the official/original source will be liable for any loss, injury, claim, liability, or damage caused directly, indirectly or incidentally to errors in or omissions from the above/attached materials. The Publishers and the official/original source also disclaim and exclude all liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of the above/attached materials. The access to, and the use of, the MLTIC web portal and contents herein are subject to the Terms of Use.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS |
|
|
|
|
| CLASSIFIED |
|
| Vacancies |
|
| List of available vacancies for legal and related professionals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BOARD OF ADVISORS |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| MORE JUDGMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
